Friday, May 11, 2012

Final Post - Mike Murgo

Listening to everyone's paper topics was not only intellectually stimulating, but also very fun. I learned a lot of interesting little facts, like how there is only 1 out, gay athlete in professional athletics. I was also intrigued by how many students focused on masculinity in their papers. I never really thought about all the subsets of it and ways that it could be interpreted, so listening to all the things that my classmates did with it truly expanded my mind. I felt that Josie's paper, which dealt with women in the middle east, was the most unique topic. Her presentation, along with many other students' presentations, made me wish I could read my classmates' papers. The presentations were a nice way to get the gist of the topic, but I wanted to delve deeper. Ellie's paper, for example, dealt with the correlation of homophobia and gender. As a social justice oriented person and an advocate for the queer rights movement, I almost wish she just read her entire paper to the class right then and there.
Overall, I truly enjoyed taking this class. I feel like I learned so much about the world that I never really understood or delved into before. My favorite units had to be Sexuality and The Social Construction of Gender and Socialization. Before taking this class, I knew that masculinity and gender roles were problematic in many ways, but I never really knew how they came about. This course taught me how they are formed, taught, and spread throughout society.
Although I enjoyed learning about all these topics, I don't know if any class has ever depressed me as much as this one has (in a good way, though - now we know what to attack in order to fix it). Naturally, sociology is about critically examining our society. Unfortunately, this critical analysis reveals many unsettling statistics and facts. The most memorable ones, for me at least, involved the degradation of women. Miss Representation did a fantastic job of revealing the atrocities that women still face in this supposedly progressive age, but I don't know if that movie will stick with me throughout my life as well as a scene we watched in class where male band members slapped pieces of bologna on a woman's butt. Of the two major genders, women are undoubtedly the more oppressed gender, but I would have liked to learn more about male oppression as well. I feel that we focused primarily on issues of feminism, which is fine and incredibly valuable, but it would have been great to have a lesson on the difference between feminism and the men's rights movement, and how men can face oppression as well (like how the general public typically does not take women raping men as seriously as men raping women, how they perceive it as humorous, etc), granted, to a much lesser extent than the oppression that women face. This article takes an interesting approach: http://www.avoiceformen.com/mens-rights/whats-the-difference/
I would have enjoyed having a discussion about it with the class. Furthermore, I feel that we didn't explore the tensions and divides within feminism as much as we could have. I often felt that issues arose, a stance was taken, and everyone agreed with it. FGM was a great example of what I was looking for; we examined the dynamics and ethics of choice and how the world influences such decisions, and not everyone agreed on the topic. I also liked how we were all in a circle for that discussion, as I felt that it really encouraged participation and it made it easier to accommodate. I know that, for me, round-table discussion always makes me speak up more.
In the end, I truly enjoyed taking this class and will be sad to let it go next semester. Thanks for the awesome few months, Professor Jafar and all my classmates!

5 comments:

  1. Emily Hunter-I absolutely loved the documentary "Miss Representation". After watching the documentary I felt empowered to try to make a difference and fight for women's rights and women's representation in the government. I think the aspect that shocked me most was hearing that many people assume that the Women's Movement is dead. While women have obviously gained a large number of rights, there is still so much that could be improved upon (as we have seen in this class). I do hope that the feminist movement is able to gain strength and support rather than allowing for the gradual reinforcement of old gendered stereotypes. I think the image that will be burned in my mind is the sexual/violent abuse of women in the "Wrestling with Manhood" documentary. The image of a stadium full of men cheering as a man strips a women, beats the women, and humiliates the woman made me sick to my stomach. I, as a women, felt personally attacked by this and can not believe the women in this documentary were supporting the images of women and men represented. With children learning from gender roles such as these, how do we expect any positive change to be made.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Molly B- Emily and Mike I also really really enjoyed Miss Representation and think it did an extraordinary job of sending the right message about media and its connection to women in power and perception of control as a whole. I am very critical of movies in this category and I thought Miss Representation hit the most important aspects of power and its linkage to patriarchy in regards to women.

      Delete
  2. Hey Mike, Just to discuss a couple things with you. While this class does share a lot with feminism I would argue that is because sociology and feminism in a lot of ways significantly overlap, especially when feminism is used as a framework for looking at power rather than an activist position. I just wanted to engage with you on a couple things in this post because I really respect you as a classmate. Firstly when you talk about men being oppressed, I think it's really important to understand the definition of oppression that you are using. Sociologists, and yes feminists, use a definition of oppression that is personal prejudice plus institutional or systematic power. The common consensus is that men, like white or heterosexual people cannot be oppressed because they hold the dominant position within the power system. This document really lays out the thinking behind this position very well: www.amsa.org/AMSA/.../Power_Privilege_Definitions.sflb.ashx.

    As for your citing of the Men's Right Movement, there has been a great deal of sociological research done on this subject. This book by Kimmel for instance is really great: http://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=ksbyvqKZL2MC&oi=fnd&pg=PR11&dq=men%27s+rights+movement&ots=hbdyycyuFd&sig=B38gICrmy-rulz9EnpPmXdfe1zU#v=onepage&q=men%27s%20rights%20movement&f=false
    I think you should of course form your own opinions but many times the article you linked to and Men's Rights Movements in general are operating from a false understanding of both feminism and of how power is systematic not individual. For instances the rape of men by men not being taken as seriously as rape by women is very much a part of patriarchy and feminist goals of getting rid of the gender binary and patriarchy would have to necessarily address this and do address this. I really respect you Mike which is why I bring this up with you. Before taking or advocating for any position, you should be aware of who you are representing.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I appreciate your reply, Brooke, but you are jumping to far too many conclusions and are assuming subtext that is not there. To be clear, I was not "advocating" for or "representing" the men's rights movement as you falsely assume. I was merely suggesting that we examine it and have a discussion about its components, legitimacy, etc. I honestly do not know much about it, which is why I would like to have the discussion. I stated the the article "took an interesting approach", not that I was "advocating" for its contents or "representing" its ideals, as you suggest I am.
      I did, however, make the claim that men can face oppression on the individual level. Perhaps "oppression" was not the correct word that I was looking for, as it implies an overarching effect as you point out, but I still stand by the idea that men can face individual circumstances of gender discrimination. As a gender equalist, I firmly believe that just because power is systematic and men hold the dominant position, this does not mean that we can disregard individual occasions where men face unequal treatment. Recently, I watched a youtube video of two school girls brutally stripping and humiliating a male classmate in public until he was nude. No charges were pressed, it was viewed as a "prank", and the situation was handled lightly. If the genders were reversed, there is no doubt in my mind that the situation would have been taken as sexual assault. While it is true that women face much, much more unequal treatment socially and institutionally than men do, we should not disregard the instances where men face unequal treatment as well. I was merely suggesting that we examine this idea.

      Delete
    2. Hey Mike,

      I want to apologize because having read your response, I completely misinterpreted what you were saying and misread your tone. I actually feel pretty bad about jumping at you like that now, having read your comment and reread your post.

      As you probably figured out I mistakenly assumed that you were advocating for men's rights as a framework rather than as an subject of study. As as subject of study, I would definitely agree with you that it would make a great subject for the class. This was probably due in part to my reading of your use of the word oppression which I read as systematic. I absolutely do agree with you that men can face instances of individual prejudice and that this is something which should be examined sociologically.

      So once again, I really want to apologize for my content/tone - I should have asked what your intent was since it was unclear to me rather than assuming. Not to justify but I was at about hour sixteen of a highly caffeinated finals essay-writing/study session and going a little crazy. Beyond that Men's Rights Movement arguments/logic tend to make me very emotional very quickly because of how harmful to gender equality I view them and I definitely need to work on separating my emotions from my analysis in this area. I really hope there are no hard feelings about this - I respect you a lot and am really sorry about this whole thing now.

      Delete