Sunday, February 12, 2012

Dakota Peschel's Response to "Tough Guise"


     “Tough Guise” aimed to prove through various media sources that today's young men are being corrupted by images of violence, and this violence has been gendered male. Men are constantly held to hold the highest standard in masculinity; if they choose not to, then they choose to be subject to ridicule and constant doubt of their masculinity. The “box of masculinity” that we place our young men in only causes anguished and destructively violent behavior. What “Tough Guise” hopes to point out is the extremely toxic environment that young men are subject to growing up and how it affects their outward behavior toward their peers.
     One fascinating, yet horrific, example of how toxic masculinity affects young men has been school shootings. Every case that they specifically pointed out has been due to the fact that the young shooters were tormented by other boys daily about their lack of masculinity. They were constantly called out for it, and after a while they felt that they had to do something drastic in order to vindicate themselves, which came in the form of killing many innocent students, sometimes teachers, within their school. If only we could get into their heads, I would like to ask them why the felt like this was the last resort. Guns are “the great equalizer” for these boys, because they feel that they must inflict an act of extreme violence on their community. Women, on the other hand, are less subject to acting violently, and when they do, it is more noticeable because violence is an action that is very gendered in men. What would happen if a girl committed murder by shooting up her high school? Would this attract more attention from the media because it was a woman? I suppose we will never know these questions unless something tragic like this happens, but why is it that males are the only perpetrators of these violent acts?

No comments:

Post a Comment